100+ Healthcare Local SEO Statistics for 2026

This benchmark report compiles U.S. healthcare local SEO statistics across map pack review volumes, rating floors, website presence, content coverage, and market difficulty.

It is built on Stethon Digital Marketing’s own research database: a map pack scan across 191 US cities in 22 healthcare specialties, a content analysis of 22,614 clinic pages, and a scan of 602 healthcare Google Business Profiles, supplemented with verified third-party consumer data. It is a research-first reference designed to be citable and easy to scan, not a promise of results.

Get a free healthcare local SEO audit

Produced by Stethon Digital Marketing (healthcare performance marketing). Coverage window: 2019 through 2026, with each statistic labeled by its dataset year.

100+ healthcare local SEO statistics for 2026 map pack, reviews and website benchmarks by Stethon Digital Marketing

US Healthcare Local SEO Statistics (Benchmarks for 2026)
100+ Healthcare Local SEO Statistics for Clinics in 2026
Methodology of this healthcare local SEO statistics report
FAQ
What this means for your clinic

US Healthcare Local SEO Statistics (Benchmarks for 2026)

Signal	KPI	Benchmark	Scope notes	Primary source
Map pack reviews	Avg, top 3 chiropractic	295.9	51 US cities	Stethon (2026)
Map pack reviews	Avg, top 3 mental health	100.6	56 US cities	Stethon (2026)
Map pack rating	Avg, top 3 chiropractic	4.91	51 US cities	Stethon (2026)
Map pack rating	Avg, top 3 mental health	4.23	56 US cities	Stethon (2026)
Website presence	Top 3 practices with site	91.7-93.8%	MH and chiro	Stethon (2026)
Content coverage	Avg topic coverage score	0.237-0.447	22,614 clinic pages	Stethon (2026)
GBP ratings	Healthcare profiles at 4.5+	76.0%	602 profiles	Stethon (2026)
Consumer behavior	Search local weekly	80%	US consumers	SOCi (2024)
Patient behavior	Reviews as first step to find a doctor	71%	US patients	Software Advice (2020)
Access	Online scheduling influences choice	80%	Healthcare consumers	Press Ganey (2025)

Quick-diagnostic healthcare local SEO benchmarks. Full numerated statistics below.

How clinics use this snapshot: use the table as a constraint detector, then follow the patient path end to end. If your review count is below the specialty floor, prominence is the leak; if reviews are fine but calls are not coming, profile completeness and page coverage are usually the leak; if both are fine, the market itself may be the constraint and the difficulty data below tells you how big.

100+ Healthcare Local SEO Statistics for Clinics in 2026

A) Map pack review volume benchmarks

Quote-ready summary: the healthcare map pack review floor is specialty-specific, and the chiropractic-to-mental-health gap is roughly three to one, which makes generic review targets useless for clinic budgeting.

1. The average top 3 map pack chiropractic practice carries 295.9 reviews across 51 US cities. (Stethon, 2026)
2. The median top 3 chiropractic practice carries 280.3 reviews. (Stethon, 2026)
3. The maximum review count observed at a single top 3 chiropractic practice is 951, in Washington DC. (Stethon, 2026)
4. The chiropractic review floor for top-quartile competitive markets is roughly 400+ reviews. (Stethon, 2026)
5. The average top 3 map pack mental health practice carries 100.6 reviews across 56 US cities. (Stethon, 2026)
6. The median top 3 mental health practice carries 83.3 reviews, meaning half of ranked practices sit below 84. (Stethon, 2026)
7. The maximum review count at a single top 3 mental health practice is 978. (Stethon, 2026)
8. The mental health review floor for top-quartile competitive markets is roughly 145 reviews. (Stethon, 2026)
9. The chiropractic average (295.9) is ~2.94x the mental health average (100.6). (Calculated)
10. The chiropractic-to-mental-health review gap at the top 3 is ~195.3 reviews. (Calculated: 295.9-100.6)
11. The top-quartile floor gap is ~255 reviews (400 chiropractic vs 145 mental health). (Calculated)
12. Washington DC is the most review-saturated chiropractic market at 489.7 average top 3 reviews. (Stethon, 2026)
13. Nashville ties DC at 489.7 average top 3 chiropractic reviews, the highest in the chiropractic sample. (Stethon, 2026)
14. Charlotte averages 481.0 top 3 chiropractic reviews, third highest measured. (Stethon, 2026)
15. San Antonio is the most review-concentrated mental health market at 432.3 average top 3 reviews, more than 4x the specialty average. (Stethon, 2026)
16. The San Antonio mental health maximum is 689 reviews on a single practice. (Stethon, 2026)
17. New York averages 261.3 top 3 mental health reviews with a 752 maximum. (Stethon, 2026)
18. The easiest measured chiropractic market, Richmond, averages just 33.0 top 3 reviews. (Stethon, 2026)
19. The easiest measured mental health market, Bozeman, averages 2.0 top 3 reviews. (Stethon, 2026)
20. The hardest-to-easiest review spread in mental health is ~430 reviews (432.3 San Antonio vs 2.0 Bozeman). (Calculated)
21. The hardest-to-easiest average review ratio in chiropractic is ~14.8x (489.7 DC vs 33.0 Richmond). (Calculated)
22. A program generating 20-25 reviews per month closes the chiropractic 400-review gap in roughly 16-20 months. (Stethon, 2026)
23. A program generating 10-15 reviews per month closes the mental health 145-review gap in roughly 10-15 months. (Stethon, 2026)
24. At 20-25 reviews per month, the mental health gap closes in 6-8 months, roughly half the chiropractic runway. (Stethon, 2026; Calculated comparison)

Stethon Digital Marketing commentary: the review floor is the entry ticket, not the strategy. Clinics that win budget against the measured floor for their specialty and metro, then spend the remainder on conversion infrastructure, consistently outperform clinics that chase a generic “get more reviews” target.

B) Rating floor benchmarks by specialty and city

Quote-ready summary: the healthcare rating floor is not universal: chiropractic competes at a 4.9 floor while mental health competes at 4.2, and four of the ten hardest mental health markets rank below 4.0.

25. The national average rating across top 3 chiropractic practices is 4.91. (Stethon, 2026)
26. The national average rating across top 3 mental health practices is 4.23. (Stethon, 2026)
27. The cross-specialty rating gap is ~0.68 stars, close to three-quarters of a full star. (Calculated: 4.91-4.23)
28. Eight of the ten hardest chiropractic markets carry average top 3 ratings between 4.90 and 4.97. (Stethon, 2026)
29. Los Angeles, San Diego, Indianapolis, and Nashville all tie at 4.97 average top 3 chiropractic rating. (Stethon, 2026)
30. The lowest average rating in the chiropractic top 10 hardest is Charlotte at 4.83. (Stethon, 2026)
31. No top 10 hardest chiropractic market averages below 4.83, which effectively sets a 4.9 floor for tier 1 chiropractic. (Stethon, 2026)
32. Four of the ten hardest mental health markets average below 4.0 at the top 3. (Stethon, 2026)
33. Philadelphia averages 3.50 across its top 3 mental health practices, the lowest in the sample’s top 10. (Stethon, 2026)
34. San Diego averages 3.77, Austin 3.93, and Denver 3.97 across their top 3 mental health practices. (Stethon, 2026)
35. Columbus is the mental health outlier: only 29.7 average top 3 reviews but a 4.97 average rating. (Stethon, 2026)
36. Washington DC (4.90) and New York (4.83) are the only other mental health top 10 markets above 4.8. (Stethon, 2026)
37. The rating spread inside the mental health top 10 is 1.47 stars (4.97 Columbus vs 3.50 Philadelphia). (Calculated)
38. The rating spread inside the chiropractic top 10 is 0.14 stars (4.97 vs 4.83), roughly a tenth of the mental health spread. (Calculated)
39. A 4.3 average rating is fully competitive in mental health local SEO but structurally uncompetitive in tier 1 chiropractic. (Stethon, 2026)
40. Across 602 healthcare Google Business Profiles, 34.7% carry a perfect 5.0 rating. (Stethon, 2026)
41. 53.6% of the 602 healthcare profiles sit at 4.9 or above. (Stethon, 2026)
42. 76.0% of the 602 healthcare profiles sit at 4.5 or above. (Stethon, 2026)
43. Only 14.8% of the 602 healthcare profiles rate below 4.0. (Stethon, 2026)
44. A sub-4.0 healthcare profile therefore sits in roughly the bottom 1-in-7 of its competitive field. (Calculated framing; Stethon, 2026)

Stethon Digital Marketing commentary: mental health patients who leave public reviews skew negative relative to the satisfied baseline, because a successful therapy outcome rarely triggers public praise while a bad experience does. That is why a rating target borrowed from chiropractic or dental is misallocated effort in behavioral health.

C) Website presence benchmarks

Quote-ready summary: a working website is now a prerequisite for the healthcare map pack, present on more than 9 in 10 top-ranked profiles in both measured specialties.

45. 93.8% of top 3 map pack chiropractic practices operate a working website linked from their Google Business Profile. (Stethon, 2026)
46. 91.7% of top 3 map pack mental health practices operate a working website. (Stethon, 2026)
47. Only 6.2% of top 3 chiropractic practices rank without a website, concentrated almost entirely in tier 3 markets. (Stethon, 2026)
48. Only 8.3% of top 3 mental health practices rank without a website, also concentrated in tier 3 markets. (Stethon, 2026)
49. Website-less rankings are structurally fragile: they exist only where review floors are also low. (Stethon, 2026)
50. Google states a complete Business Profile makes customers 2.7x more likely to consider a business reputable. (Google)
51. Google states customers are 70% more likely to visit and 50% more likely to consider purchasing from a business with a complete profile. (Google)
52. Google names its three local ranking factors directly: relevance, distance, and prominence. (Google Business Profile Help)

D) Website content coverage: where clinic sites quietly lose

Quote-ready summary: the average mental health clinic page covers less than a quarter of the topics patients search for, which makes complete content one of the cheapest durable advantages in healthcare local SEO.

53. Across 22,614 healthcare clinic pages analyzed, chiropractic pages average a 0.447 topic coverage score (1.0 = full coverage). (Stethon, 2026; n=1,614 chiropractic pages)
54. Mental health pages average just 0.237 coverage across 1,377 pages. (Stethon, 2026)
55. The chiropractic-to-mental-health coverage ratio is ~1.89x. (Calculated: 0.447/0.237)
56. The average chiropractic page fully covers 4.4 topics, mentions 8.1, and leaves 4.6 absent. (Stethon, 2026)
57. The average mental health page fully covers just 1.2 topics, mentions 5.5, and leaves 7.5 absent. (Stethon, 2026)
58. 92.2% of chiropractic pages fully cover “what is chiropractic care,” the single best-covered topic measured. (Stethon, 2026)
59. Only 50.5% of chiropractic pages explain what to expect on a first visit. (Stethon, 2026)
60. Only 35.7% of chiropractic pages carry patient testimonials, and 12.7% omit them entirely. (Stethon, 2026)
61. Only 19.8% of chiropractic pages fully cover conditions treated, and 29.5% leave the topic absent. (Stethon, 2026)
62. Only 19.8% of chiropractic pages carry a full FAQ; 55.9% have none. (Stethon, 2026)
63. Only 15.1% of chiropractic pages clearly state location and hours. (Stethon, 2026)
64. Only 8.9% of chiropractic pages fully present team credentials. (Stethon, 2026)
65. Only 6.6% of chiropractic pages address insurance and payment; 48.8% omit it entirely. (Stethon, 2026)
66. Just 1.3% of chiropractic pages cover workers compensation, with 87.9% absent, despite it being a core chiropractic revenue line. (Stethon, 2026)
67. Pricing transparency is fully covered on ~0.1% of chiropractic pages and absent from 72.9%. (Stethon, 2026)
68. The best-covered mental health topic is crisis resources at just 22.1% full coverage, with 32.6% of pages omitting it. (Stethon, 2026)
69. Only 17.9% of mental health pages carry a full FAQ; 67.8% have none. (Stethon, 2026)
70. Only 9.2% of mental health pages clearly state location and hours; 40.5% omit them. (Stethon, 2026)
71. Only 8.5% of mental health pages address insurance and payment; 45.8% omit it. (Stethon, 2026)
72. Only 5.6% of mental health pages explain what to expect, and only 3.8% describe the first appointment. (Stethon, 2026)
73. Only 4.2% of mental health pages fully cover telehealth options; 52.1% omit the topic entirely. (Stethon, 2026)
74. Only 2.8% of mental health pages fully cover conditions treated; 61% leave it absent. (Stethon, 2026)
75. Only 2.0% of mental health pages carry patient testimonials and only 0.8% address confidentiality, with 94.1% omitting confidentiality entirely. (Stethon, 2026)
76. Insurance, hours, FAQ, and what-to-expect are the exact pre-booking questions patients ask, and the median clinic page answers none of them. (Stethon, 2026; derived framing)

Stethon Digital Marketing commentary: content depth is the most underpriced local SEO lever because the field is this thin. In a market where fewer than 1 in 10 behavioral health pages state their own hours or insurance participation, a complete service page is a durable ranking and conversion advantage, not a nice-to-have.

E) Market difficulty across 22 healthcare specialties

Quote-ready summary: local SEO difficulty concentrates in a handful of metros: Dallas appears in the top 10 hardest list for 18 of 22 healthcare specialties, and difficulty aligns almost perfectly with metro tier.

77. The Stethon difficulty index ranked local map pack competition across 191 US cities and 22 healthcare specialties (1,174 city-specialty data cells). (Stethon, 2026)
78. Rehab is the hardest local specialty measured, with a benchmark raw score of 123.1 (Dallas). (Stethon, 2026)
79. Wellness/med spa ranks second hardest at 119.98 (San Antonio) and chiropractic third at 119.76 (Seattle). (Stethon, 2026)
80. Mental health ranks 21st of 22 specialties in local difficulty at 90.63 (San Antonio), making it one of the most open healthcare fields to enter. (Stethon, 2026)
81. Primary care is the least difficult local specialty measured at 89.66 (Dallas). (Stethon, 2026)
82. The hardest-to-easiest specialty difficulty spread is ~33.4 points (123.1 rehab vs 89.66 primary care). (Calculated)
83. Orthodontics beats mental health in difficulty in 34 of 34 shared cities (100%). (Stethon, 2026)
84. Plastic surgery and wellness/med spa each beat mental health in 27 of 28 shared cities (96%). (Stethon, 2026)
85. Chiropractic beats ABA therapy in 34 of 35 shared cities (97%). (Stethon, 2026)
86. Dallas appears in the top 10 hardest local list for 18 of 22 specialties, the most of any US city, at an average rank of 3.9. (Stethon, 2026)
87. Denver and Chicago each appear in 17 of 22 specialty top 10 lists. (Stethon, 2026)
88. San Antonio and Charlotte each appear in 16 of 22; San Diego and Seattle in 14. (Stethon, 2026)
89. Austin carries the most severe average rank (3.2) among cities appearing in 11+ specialty top 10 lists. (Stethon, 2026)
90. All 10 of the 10 hardest mental health markets are tier 1 metros; all 10 easiest are tier 3. (Stethon, 2026)
91. Nine of the 10 hardest chiropractic markets are tier 1; no tier 3 city appears in either specialty’s top 10. (Stethon, 2026)
92. Tier 3 metros account for 52.9% of the chiropractic sample (27 of 51) and 51.8% of the mental health sample (29 of 56). (Stethon, 2026)
93. The five easiest mental health markets (Bozeman, Clearwater, Boca Raton, Newark, New Orleans) carry raw scores of 17.15 to 34.44. (Stethon, 2026)
94. Four of the 10 easiest mental health markets have single-digit average top 3 review counts. (Stethon, 2026)
95. The five easiest chiropractic markets (Richmond, Erie, Orlando, Portland, Scottsdale) carry raw scores of 41.06 to 56.17. (Stethon, 2026)
96. Tier 1 metros carry a +20 difficulty adjustment in the scoring model, tier 2 +8, tier 3 zero, and the output aligns almost perfectly with tier, validating the model. (Stethon, 2026)

Most competitive local healthcare metros	Specialties in top-10 hardest (of 22)	Avg rank	Metro tier
Dallas	18	3.9	1
Denver	17	5.9	1
Chicago	17	5.2	1
San Antonio	16	4.1	1
Charlotte	16	5.2	1
San Diego	14	6.4	1
Seattle	14	6.0	1
Los Angeles	13	4.7	1
Austin	11	3.2	1

Universal competitive markets across 22 healthcare specialties, local map pack track (Stethon Digital Marketing, 2026).

F) Patient and consumer local search behavior

Quote-ready summary: local search is a weekly habit and reviews are the first stop, so map pack visibility, listings accuracy, and booking friction decide the patient before the website does.

97. 80% of US consumers search online for a local business at least weekly. (SOCi Consumer Behavior Index, 2024)
98. 32% search for local businesses every day or multiple times a day. (SOCi, 2024)
99. 75% of consumers read online reviews regularly or always; only 3% never do. (BrightLocal, 2024)
100. 81% of consumers use Google to read local business reviews, down from 87% in 2023. (BrightLocal, 2024)
101. 77% of consumers use two or more review platforms, and 41% use three or more. (BrightLocal, 2024)
102. 88% of consumers would use a business that responds to all its reviews, versus 47% for one that does not respond. (BrightLocal, 2024)
103. 50% of consumers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations. (BrightLocal, 2024)
104. 71% of patients use online reviews as the first step to find a new doctor. (Software Advice, 2020)
105. 90% of patients use online reviews to evaluate physicians. (Software Advice, 2020)
106. 80% of healthcare consumers say online scheduling influences their choice of provider. (Press Ganey, 2025)
107. Nine in ten healthcare consumers say accurate listings information is key to trust and credibility. (Press Ganey, 2025)
108. Google has reported that 76% of people who search for something nearby on a smartphone visit a business within a day. (Google, 2016)
109. 28% of nearby searches result in a purchase. (Google, 2016)
110. Mobile searches for “near me now” grew 150%+ and “near me today/tonight” grew 900%+ in Google’s 2015-vs-2017 data. (Think with Google)
111. Google has said roughly 46% of searches carry local intent (a verbal Google statement, not a published study; treat as directional). (Google, 2018)
112. The average Google Business Profile drew ~1,260 views per month and ~59 customer actions in BrightLocal’s 45,000-listing study. (BrightLocal, 2019)

Stethon Digital Marketing commentary: map visibility earns the moment, trust converts it, and speed keeps it: when the profile is complete, reviews are current, and booking works on mobile, the same ranking produces meaningfully more patients.

Methodology of this healthcare local SEO statistics report

What this is: a US-focused compilation of healthcare local SEO benchmarks assembled from Stethon Digital Marketing’s first-party research datasets (2026) and named third-party studies (2016-2025), each stat labeled with its source and year.

First-party datasets: (1) a map pack scan capturing the top 3 Google Business Profile listings for high-intent commercial queries across 191 US cities in 22 healthcare specialties, recording review counts, ratings, website presence, and metro tier; (2) a content analysis scoring 22,614 clinic pages against per-specialty topic models; (3) a scan of 602 healthcare Google Business Profiles recording primary category and rating. Difficulty scores combine log-compressed review volume, rating floor above a 4.0 baseline, website coverage, and a metro tier adjustment (tier 1 +20, tier 2 +8, tier 3 +0).

Inclusion rules: only statistics present in the named datasets are used. Stats labeled “(Calculated)” are simple arithmetic derived from the cited numbers, with no external inputs. Third-party figures that could not be traced to a primary source were excluded. Benchmarks are directional; performance varies by specialty, geography, offer, landing experience, and tracking quality.

Sources

Stethon Digital Marketing Healthcare SEO Research 2026 (191-city map pack scan; 22,614-page content analysis; 602-profile GBP scan)
BrightLocal (Local Consumer Review Survey 2024; Google My Business Insights Study 2019)
SOCi (Consumer Behavior Index 2024)
Google (Business Profile Help: complete profile and local ranking; Micro-Moments research 2016; Think with Google near me data 2015-2017; 2018 verbal local-intent statement)
Press Ganey (Patients as Consumers, 2025)
Software Advice (How Patients Use Online Reviews, 2020)

Editorial disclaimer

This report is an editorial synthesis of Stethon Digital Marketing’s first-party research and named third-party benchmarks. It is not medical advice, not legal advice, and not a guarantee of marketing outcomes. Healthcare marketing is subject to platform policies, privacy requirements, and (where applicable) HIPAA-related operational constraints. Always consult qualified compliance guidance for your clinic and jurisdiction.

Stethon Digital Marketing Team

Al Heitzer – Founder

Stethon Digital Marketing is a healthcare performance marketing agency providing SEO, PPC, and social media advertising for independent practices, chiropractors, and mental health clinics nationwide. This report draws on our internal research database, tracking healthcare listings across multiple states and specialties, layered with ongoing SERP analysis to replace anecdotal marketing advice with real, data-backed benchmarks.

Related reading: SEO for Doctors: Full Guide to Get Massive Results in 2026. If you want a clear-eyed look at your numbers, our free clinic marketing audit breaks it down at no cost.

FAQ

How many Google reviews does my practice actually need to show up in the map pack?

It really depends on your specialty and your city, so ignore any “get to 100 reviews” rule of thumb. In our data the average top-three chiropractor carries about 296 reviews, while the average top-three mental health practice sits closer to 100. In the most competitive metros you’re looking at 400+ for chiro and around 145 for mental health, but in smaller tier-three markets you can often break into the top three with fewer than 50 — and for mental health, sometimes fewer than 10. The honest answer: find the floor for your specialty in your metro, then aim a little above it.

What star rating do I need to stay competitive?

Again, it varies by field. Top-ranked chiropractors average about 4.9 stars, and in the toughest markets almost everyone sits between 4.9 and 5.0, so there’s very little room to slip. Mental health is more forgiving — top practices average around 4.2, and in several of the hardest cities the leaders are actually below 4.0. That’s because happy therapy patients rarely post reviews while unhappy ones do. As a general benchmark, about three-quarters of healthcare profiles we scanned sit at 4.5 or above, so once you drop below 4.5 you start to look like an outlier.

Which cities are the hardest to rank in?

Dallas is the toughest overall — it lands in the ten hardest markets for 18 of the 22 specialties we measured. Denver and Chicago aren’t far behind, followed by San Antonio and Charlotte. The pattern is very consistent: difficulty tracks the size of the metro almost perfectly. Every one of the hardest mental health markets we found was a tier-one city, and every one of the easiest was a smaller tier-three market. If you’re choosing where to compete, that’s worth knowing before you spend a dollar.

Why do so many healthcare websites underperform locally?

Usually it comes down to thin content. When we analyzed 22,614 clinic pages, the average page answered only a fraction of what patients actually search for. Fewer than one in ten mental health pages clearly state their hours or whether they take insurance, and hardly any explain what a first visit looks like — the exact questions that decide whether someone calls. Having a website is now table stakes (more than nine in ten top-ranked practices have one); what sets you apart is a page that actually answers the questions patients are asking.

Is local SEO worth it compared to just running ads?

They work best together rather than as either-or. Most people search for local businesses every week, and the majority of patients start their search for a new doctor by reading reviews, so a strong local presence pays off every single day without a per-click cost. In smaller markets you can often earn a top-three spot within a couple of quarters with reviews and good content alone. In bigger, more competitive cities it takes longer to build that organic prominence, so running paid search alongside it keeps new patients coming in while your rankings catch up.

Applying These Statistics to Your Healthcare Business in 2026

Taken together, these numbers turn local SEO into a sequenced program rather than a checklist. Complete your Google Business Profile first, since it is free and Google rewards a full listing directly; then close the content-coverage gaps most clinic sites leave open; and finally run a review program sized to the measured floor for your specialty and metro instead of a generic target.

That floor is specialty-specific, which is why the plan looks different from one practice to the next: mental health SEO and chiropractic SEO call for different targets, and the review side of the work leans heavily on consistent reputation management.

These findings connect to the rest of the local picture as well. For the map-ranking piece specifically, our research on Google Local Pack benchmarks for healthcare breaks down what it takes to hold a top-three position city by city.

Reviews remain one of the most decisive local ranking and conversion factors, so this report pairs naturally with our Google review statistics when you plan the reputation side of local search.

Cite this research (APA): Heitzer, Al. (2026). 100+ Healthcare Local SEO Statistics for 2026. Stethon Digital Marketing Healthcare SEO Research 2026. https://stethondigitalmarketing.com/healthcare-local-seo-statistics/

Healthcare local SEO statistics show that proximity, reviews, and profile completeness drive patient acquisition for clinics in 2026.

100+ Healthcare Local SEO Statistics for 2026

Table of contents

US Healthcare Local SEO Statistics (Benchmarks for 2026)

100+ Healthcare Local SEO Statistics for Clinics in 2026

A) Map pack review volume benchmarks

B) Rating floor benchmarks by specialty and city

C) Website presence benchmarks

D) Website content coverage: where clinic sites quietly lose

E) Market difficulty across 22 healthcare specialties

F) Patient and consumer local search behavior

Methodology of this healthcare local SEO statistics report

Sources

Editorial disclaimer

FAQ

Applying These Statistics to Your Healthcare Business in 2026

QUICK CONTACT